everything you want to know (and don't) about arkansas politics

Republican Sponsorship
Business & Economy

SB339

To Amend The Law Regarding Working Animal Protection; And To Provide For Working Animal Protection In Counties.

Failed

Last Action (May 1, 2023): Died in House Committee at Sine Die Adjournment

Sponsors

AI-Generated Summary

Senate Bill 339 establishes a state-level protection for 'working animals' within Arkansas counties. It defines a working animal as a nonhuman animal used for specific duties in commerce, service, transportation, education, competition, or exhibition, explicitly excluding livestock such as cattle, poultry, and sheep. The bill guarantees the right to utilize these animals for their own benefit or for the benefit of the individuals they serve. It prohibits counties from enacting ordinances that would ban, terminate, or create undue hardship for the use of working animals in various sectors, including commerce, hunting, and entertainment. The legislation clarifies that it does not override existing state laws regarding animal care, public health, and public safety. Additionally, it preserves the authority of counties to manage zoning ordinances and local animal care regulations, provided they do not conflict with the protections granted to working animals under this act.

Potential Impact Analysis

Who Might Benefit?

The primary beneficiaries are owners and operators of businesses and organizations that utilize animals for labor, service, or exhibition, such as therapy animal trainers, entertainment venues (e.g., circuses or rodeos), competitive sporting organizations, and providers of transportation or exhibition services. These entities benefit by being shielded from local county-level ordinances that could otherwise restrict or prohibit the use of working animals in their professional operations.

Who Might Suffer?

County governments could be negatively impacted as the bill restricts their legislative authority to regulate or ban specific animal-based activities within their jurisdictions. Animal welfare advocacy groups or local residents who prefer stricter local control over the treatment, display, or use of working animals might also feel negatively impacted, as they would lose the ability to lobby for county-level bans or restrictive ordinances that this bill effectively preempts.

Vote Records

Third Reading

March 16, 2023
Yea: 29 Nay: 2 NV: 4 Absent: 0 Passed
View individual votes (35)
Legislator Party Chamber Vote
Jane English Republican Senate NV
Linda Chesterfield Democrat Senate Yea
Jonathan Dismang Republican Senate Yea
Greg Leding Democrat Senate Yea
Missy Irvin Republican Senate NV
Bryan King Republican Senate Yea
Kim Hammer Republican Senate Yea
Stephanie Flowers Democrat Senate Yea
Frederick Love Democrat Senate Yea
Terry Rice Republican Senate NV
Reginald Murdock Democrat Senate Yea
Gary Stubblefield Republican Senate Yea
Jim Dotson Republican Senate Nay
John Payton Republican Senate Yea
Alan Clark Republican Senate Yea
Ronald Caldwell Republican Senate Yea
Bart Hester Republican Senate Yea
Jimmy Hickey Republican Senate Yea
Dan Sullivan Republican Senate Yea
David Wallace Republican Senate Yea
Blake Johnson Republican Senate Yea
Justin Boyd Republican Senate Yea
Clarke Tucker Democrat Senate Yea
Scott Flippo Republican Senate Yea
Clint Penzo Republican Senate Nay
Mark Johnson Republican Senate Yea
Ricky Hill Republican Senate Yea
Breanne Davis Republican Senate Yea
Ben Gilmore Republican Senate Yea
Joshua Bryant Republican Senate Yea
Matt McKee Republican Senate Yea
Jim Petty Republican Senate Yea
Steve Crowell Republican Senate Yea
Tyler Dees Republican Senate NV
Matt Stone Republican Senate Yea
Read Full Bill on arkleg.state.ar.us