SB339
To Amend The Law Regarding Working Animal Protection; And To Provide For Working Animal Protection In Counties.
Last Action (May 1, 2023): Died in House Committee at Sine Die Adjournment
Sponsors
AI-Generated Summary
Senate Bill 339 establishes a state-level protection for 'working animals' within Arkansas counties. It defines a working animal as a nonhuman animal used for specific duties in commerce, service, transportation, education, competition, or exhibition, explicitly excluding livestock such as cattle, poultry, and sheep. The bill guarantees the right to utilize these animals for their own benefit or for the benefit of the individuals they serve. It prohibits counties from enacting ordinances that would ban, terminate, or create undue hardship for the use of working animals in various sectors, including commerce, hunting, and entertainment. The legislation clarifies that it does not override existing state laws regarding animal care, public health, and public safety. Additionally, it preserves the authority of counties to manage zoning ordinances and local animal care regulations, provided they do not conflict with the protections granted to working animals under this act.
Potential Impact Analysis
Who Might Benefit?
The primary beneficiaries are owners and operators of businesses and organizations that utilize animals for labor, service, or exhibition, such as therapy animal trainers, entertainment venues (e.g., circuses or rodeos), competitive sporting organizations, and providers of transportation or exhibition services. These entities benefit by being shielded from local county-level ordinances that could otherwise restrict or prohibit the use of working animals in their professional operations.
Who Might Suffer?
County governments could be negatively impacted as the bill restricts their legislative authority to regulate or ban specific animal-based activities within their jurisdictions. Animal welfare advocacy groups or local residents who prefer stricter local control over the treatment, display, or use of working animals might also feel negatively impacted, as they would lose the ability to lobby for county-level bans or restrictive ordinances that this bill effectively preempts.
Vote Records
Third Reading
March 16, 2023View individual votes (35)
| Legislator | Party | Chamber | Vote |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jane English | Republican | Senate | NV |
| Linda Chesterfield | Democrat | Senate | Yea |
| Jonathan Dismang | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| Greg Leding | Democrat | Senate | Yea |
| Missy Irvin | Republican | Senate | NV |
| Bryan King | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| Kim Hammer | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| Stephanie Flowers | Democrat | Senate | Yea |
| Frederick Love | Democrat | Senate | Yea |
| Terry Rice | Republican | Senate | NV |
| Reginald Murdock | Democrat | Senate | Yea |
| Gary Stubblefield | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| Jim Dotson | Republican | Senate | Nay |
| John Payton | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| Alan Clark | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| Ronald Caldwell | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| Bart Hester | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| Jimmy Hickey | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| Dan Sullivan | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| David Wallace | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| Blake Johnson | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| Justin Boyd | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| Clarke Tucker | Democrat | Senate | Yea |
| Scott Flippo | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| Clint Penzo | Republican | Senate | Nay |
| Mark Johnson | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| Ricky Hill | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| Breanne Davis | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| Ben Gilmore | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| Joshua Bryant | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| Matt McKee | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| Jim Petty | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| Steve Crowell | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| Tyler Dees | Republican | Senate | NV |
| Matt Stone | Republican | Senate | Yea |
Get Notified
Receive an email when this bill's status changes.