everything you want to know (and don't) about arkansas politics

Republican Sponsorship
Education

SB532

To Amend The Law Concerning Nonpartisan Elections; To Amend The Law Concerning Local School Boards Of Directors And School Board Elections; And To Amend The Date On Which An Election Of A School District Board Of Directors Is Held.

Failed

Last Action (May 1, 2023): Died in House Committee at Sine Die Adjournment

Sponsors

AI-Generated Summary

Senate Bill 532 proposes comprehensive changes to the administration of Arkansas school board elections. The primary purpose is to standardize school board director terms to four years and align school board election dates with the state's preferential primary election schedule. The bill modifies various statutes to ensure that board positions are staggered so that an equal number are up for election at each cycle. It also updates filing procedures, candidate ballot placement rules for unopposed candidates, and protocols for conducting elections when concurrent with primary or general elections. Additionally, the bill provides mechanisms for adjusting term lengths during the transition to these new requirements. These changes affect vacancy filling, redistricting procedures for school zones, and the logistical management of polling locations for school districts.

Potential Impact Analysis

Who Might Benefit?

The primary beneficiaries include school district election officials and county clerks, who may see increased administrative efficiency through the consolidation of school board elections with primary election cycles. Voters in school districts may benefit from higher voter turnout, as school board elections will now coincide with high-turnout primary elections. Additionally, the bill provides a more standardized and predictable structure for board director terms, which may benefit school boards by ensuring consistent governance transitions.

Who Might Suffer?

Local school districts and their boards may experience a loss of local control, as they lose some flexibility in scheduling their own independent elections. Candidates for school board may be negatively impacted by the shift in election timing, as the costs and campaign strategies required to compete during a preferential primary election may be more demanding than those of standalone or special school elections. Additionally, the compression of terms and mandated transition schedules may create logistical challenges for some current board members whose existing terms must be adjusted to align with the new four-year cycle.

Vote Records

Third Reading

April 4, 2023
Yea: 22 Nay: 5 NV: 7 Absent: 1 Passed
View individual votes (35)
Legislator Party Chamber Vote
Jane English Republican Senate Yea
Linda Chesterfield Democrat Senate Nay
Jonathan Dismang Republican Senate Yea
Greg Leding Democrat Senate Nay
Missy Irvin Republican Senate Yea
Bryan King Republican Senate NV
Kim Hammer Republican Senate Yea
Stephanie Flowers Democrat Senate NV
Frederick Love Democrat Senate Nay
Terry Rice Republican Senate NV
Reginald Murdock Democrat Senate Nay
Gary Stubblefield Republican Senate NV
Jim Dotson Republican Senate Yea
John Payton Republican Senate Yea
Alan Clark Republican Senate Yea
Ronald Caldwell Republican Senate Absent
Bart Hester Republican Senate Yea
Jimmy Hickey Republican Senate NV
Dan Sullivan Republican Senate Yea
David Wallace Republican Senate Yea
Blake Johnson Republican Senate NV
Justin Boyd Republican Senate Yea
Clarke Tucker Democrat Senate Nay
Scott Flippo Republican Senate Yea
Clint Penzo Republican Senate Yea
Mark Johnson Republican Senate Yea
Ricky Hill Republican Senate Yea
Breanne Davis Republican Senate Yea
Ben Gilmore Republican Senate Yea
Joshua Bryant Republican Senate Yea
Matt McKee Republican Senate Yea
Jim Petty Republican Senate Yea
Steve Crowell Republican Senate Yea
Tyler Dees Republican Senate NV
Matt Stone Republican Senate Yea
Read Full Bill on arkleg.state.ar.us