everything you want to know (and don't) about arkansas politics

Republican Sponsorship
Government Operations

SJR13

A Constitutional Amendment To Allow A Candidate For Supreme Court Justice, Court Of Appeals Judge, Circuit Judge, Or District Judge To Declare His Or Her Party Affiliation Or Independent Status When Running For Judicial Office.

Failed

Last Action (May 5, 2025): Died on Senate Calendar at Sine Die adjournment.

Sponsors

AI-Generated Summary

SJR 13 is a proposed constitutional amendment that would allow candidates running for judicial offices—including Supreme Court Justice, Court of Appeals Judge, Circuit Judge, and District Judge—to declare their political party affiliation or independent status on the ballot. The amendment specifically modifies sections of Amendment 80 of the Arkansas Constitution to grant candidates the choice to display this information. It also authorizes the General Assembly to enact legislation regarding the election procedures for these judicial offices, including primary election requirements for partisan or independent candidates. The stated goal of the resolution is to increase transparency for voters during judicial elections. If passed by the legislature, the proposal would be submitted to Arkansas voters for approval at the next general election. If adopted by voters, the amendment would take effect on January 1, 2027.

Potential Impact Analysis

Who Might Benefit?

The primary beneficiaries are voters, who would receive additional information about a candidate's political leanings when casting their ballots in judicial races. Judicial candidates themselves also benefit by being able to explicitly declare their party affiliation, potentially allowing them to appeal to party-affiliated voters or distinguish their background and judicial philosophy more clearly on the ballot.

Who Might Suffer?

Those who believe in maintaining a strictly non-partisan judiciary may be negatively impacted, as the amendment introduces political party labels into what are currently non-partisan judicial contests. Some legal observers and voters may be concerned that this change could lead to increased polarization in judicial elections, potentially influencing public perception of judicial impartiality or incentivizing candidates to prioritize party platforms over judicial neutrality.

Read Full Bill on arkleg.state.ar.us