everything you want to know (and don't) about arkansas politics

Republican Sponsorship
Healthcare

SB282

Amending The Law Concerning Public Water Systems; And To Allow Voters To Elect "for" Or "against" Water Fluoridation.

Failed

Last Action (May 5, 2025): Died on Senate Calendar at Sine Die adjournment.

Sponsors

AI-Generated Summary

Senate Bill 282 provides a mechanism for local voters to decide whether public water systems serving 5,000 or more people should include fluoride in the water supply. The bill allows an election to be initiated through a petition signed by at least five percent of the voters from the previous county judge election or by a majority vote of the relevant county quorum court. If a majority of voters in a majority of the counties served by the system vote against fluoridation, the water system must cease adding fluoride within 30 days. The bill also specifies that the results of such an election supersede any previous or subsequent decisions made by a public water system's board regarding fluoridation. Future elections on the same issue cannot be held for at least four years following an initial vote. This legislation amends existing Arkansas law regarding the state's oversight of public water fluoridation.

Potential Impact Analysis

Who Might Benefit?

The primary beneficiaries include citizens who advocate for local control over public utility policies and those who hold personal or health-related objections to water fluoridation. Local voters and county officials gain the authority to influence the chemical composition of their community's water supply based on local preferences rather than state-level mandates.

Who Might Suffer?

The primary groups negatively impacted are public health advocates and dental health professionals who rely on community water fluoridation as a preventative public health measure to reduce tooth decay. Additionally, low-income populations who may lack consistent access to private dental care and rely on fluoridated water for dental health maintenance could see a reduction in preventative benefits if fluoridation is ceased in their region.

Vote Records

Third Reading

March 12, 2025
Yea: 16 Nay: 11 NV: 8 Absent: 0 Failed
View individual votes (35)
Legislator Party Chamber Vote
Jane English Republican Senate Nay
Jonathan Dismang Republican Senate NV
Greg Leding Democrat Senate Nay
Missy Irvin Republican Senate Nay
Bryan King Republican Senate Yea
Kim Hammer Republican Senate NV
Stephanie Flowers Democrat Senate Nay
Frederick Love Democrat Senate Nay
Terry Rice Republican Senate Yea
Reginald Murdock Democrat Senate Nay
Gary Stubblefield Republican Senate Yea
Jim Dotson Republican Senate Yea
John Payton Republican Senate Yea
Alan Clark Republican Senate Yea
Ronald Caldwell Republican Senate NV
Bart Hester Republican Senate Yea
Jimmy Hickey Republican Senate Nay
Dan Sullivan Republican Senate Yea
David Wallace Republican Senate Nay
Blake Johnson Republican Senate NV
Justin Boyd Republican Senate NV
Clarke Tucker Democrat Senate Nay
Scott Flippo Republican Senate Yea
Clint Penzo Republican Senate Yea
Mark Johnson Republican Senate NV
Ricky Hill Republican Senate Nay
Jamie Scott Democrat Senate Nay
Breanne Davis Republican Senate NV
Ben Gilmore Republican Senate NV
Joshua Bryant Republican Senate Yea
Matt McKee Republican Senate Yea
Jim Petty Republican Senate Yea
Steve Crowell Republican Senate Yea
Tyler Dees Republican Senate Yea
Matt Stone Republican Senate Yea
Read Full Bill on arkleg.state.ar.us