everything you want to know (and don't) about arkansas politics

Republican Sponsorship
Government Operations

SB471

To Amend The Law Concerning Candidates For Nonpartisan Elections; And To Allow Certain Candidates For Nonpartisan Elections To Use The Title Of The Nonpartisan Judicial Office On The Ballot.

Failed

Last Action (May 5, 2025): Died in House Committee at Sine Die adjournment.

Sponsors

AI-Generated Summary

Senate Bill 471 amends Arkansas law regarding how candidates for nonpartisan judicial offices represent their credentials on the ballot. Specifically, the bill updates the criteria under which a candidate may use their judicial title as a prefix on the ballot. It expands eligibility to include candidates currently serving as appointees to a nonpartisan judicial office who have held the position for at least twelve months, as well as candidates who have previously served in a nonpartisan judicial office. The bill broadens the terminology from specific positions like 'circuit judge' or 'district judge' to the broader category of 'nonpartisan judicial office.' The purpose is to standardize and clarify ballot title requirements for judicial candidates across various nonpartisan elections.

Potential Impact Analysis

Who Might Benefit?

The primary beneficiaries are individuals appointed to nonpartisan judicial positions who have served for at least one year, as well as individuals with prior service in any nonpartisan judicial office. By allowing these individuals to use their professional title on the ballot, they may gain a clearer advantage in voter recognition during an election.

Who Might Suffer?

Candidates running for judicial office who do not have prior or current judicial experience may be negatively impacted relative to their opponents. Because the bill allows incumbents and certain appointees to highlight their status on the ballot, candidates lacking such titles may be at a comparative disadvantage regarding name recognition and perceived qualifications among voters.

Vote Records

Third Reading

March 31, 2025
Yea: 31 Nay: 2 NV: 1 Absent: 1 Passed
View individual votes (35)
Legislator Party Chamber Vote
Jane English Republican Senate Yea
Jonathan Dismang Republican Senate Yea
Greg Leding Democrat Senate Yea
Missy Irvin Republican Senate Absent
Bryan King Republican Senate Yea
Kim Hammer Republican Senate Yea
Stephanie Flowers Democrat Senate NV
Frederick Love Democrat Senate Yea
Terry Rice Republican Senate Yea
Reginald Murdock Democrat Senate Yea
Gary Stubblefield Republican Senate Yea
Jim Dotson Republican Senate Yea
John Payton Republican Senate Yea
Alan Clark Republican Senate Yea
Ronald Caldwell Republican Senate Yea
Bart Hester Republican Senate Nay
Jimmy Hickey Republican Senate Yea
Dan Sullivan Republican Senate Yea
David Wallace Republican Senate Yea
Blake Johnson Republican Senate Yea
Justin Boyd Republican Senate Yea
Clarke Tucker Democrat Senate Yea
Scott Flippo Republican Senate Yea
Clint Penzo Republican Senate Yea
Mark Johnson Republican Senate Yea
Ricky Hill Republican Senate Yea
Jamie Scott Democrat Senate Yea
Breanne Davis Republican Senate Nay
Ben Gilmore Republican Senate Yea
Joshua Bryant Republican Senate Yea
Matt McKee Republican Senate Yea
Jim Petty Republican Senate Yea
Steve Crowell Republican Senate Yea
Tyler Dees Republican Senate Yea
Matt Stone Republican Senate Yea
Read Full Bill on arkleg.state.ar.us