SB534
To Establish The Arkansas Kratom Consumer Protection Act; And To Remove Mitragynine And 7-hydroxymitragynine, Also Known As Kratom, From The Controlled Substances List In Arkansas.
Last Action (May 5, 2025): Died in House at Sine Die adjournment.
Sponsors
AI-Generated Summary
Senate Bill 534 establishes the Arkansas Kratom Consumer Protection Act to regulate the sale and distribution of kratom products in the state. The bill removes mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine from the Arkansas controlled substances list, effectively legalizing kratom under a new regulatory framework. It mandates labeling requirements, sets an age restriction prohibiting the sale of kratom to individuals under 18, and forbids the sale of products adulterated with dangerous substances or synthetic alkaloids. Processors are required to register their products annually with the Arkansas Department of Agriculture, provide third-party certificates of analysis, and report adverse events. The bill outlines enforcement procedures, including administrative fines for violations, while providing a good-faith defense for retailers who rely on processor representations. The legislation is driven by the goal of implementing safety standards for a product that some view as a potential harm-reduction tool.
Potential Impact Analysis
Who Might Benefit?
The primary beneficiaries are consumers who use kratom for personal reasons, including those seeking potential therapeutic benefits or alternatives to traditional opioids. Additionally, the kratom industry, including manufacturers, processors, and retailers, benefits from the creation of a clear legal framework that allows for the legitimate sale and distribution of these products in Arkansas.
Who Might Suffer?
Entities that may be negatively impacted include health advocacy groups or law enforcement agencies concerned about the potential for abuse, addiction, or public health risks associated with the widespread availability of kratom. Additionally, businesses that are unable or unwilling to comply with the new registration, testing, and labeling requirements may face increased administrative costs or the loss of the ability to sell these products legally.
Vote Records
Third Reading
April 7, 2025View individual votes (35)
| Legislator | Party | Chamber | Vote |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jane English | Republican | Senate | NV |
| Jonathan Dismang | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| Greg Leding | Democrat | Senate | Yea |
| Missy Irvin | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| Bryan King | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| Kim Hammer | Republican | Senate | NV |
| Stephanie Flowers | Democrat | Senate | Yea |
| Frederick Love | Democrat | Senate | Yea |
| Terry Rice | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| Reginald Murdock | Democrat | Senate | Yea |
| Gary Stubblefield | Republican | Senate | Nay |
| Jim Dotson | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| John Payton | Republican | Senate | NV |
| Alan Clark | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| Ronald Caldwell | Republican | Senate | NV |
| Bart Hester | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| Jimmy Hickey | Republican | Senate | NV |
| Dan Sullivan | Republican | Senate | NV |
| David Wallace | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| Blake Johnson | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| Justin Boyd | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| Clarke Tucker | Democrat | Senate | Yea |
| Scott Flippo | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| Clint Penzo | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| Mark Johnson | Republican | Senate | Nay |
| Ricky Hill | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| Jamie Scott | Democrat | Senate | Yea |
| Breanne Davis | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| Ben Gilmore | Republican | Senate | Nay |
| Joshua Bryant | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| Matt McKee | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| Jim Petty | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| Steve Crowell | Republican | Senate | Yea |
| Tyler Dees | Republican | Senate | Nay |
| Matt Stone | Republican | Senate | Nay |
Get Notified
Receive an email when this bill's status changes.