everything you want to know (and don't) about arkansas politics

Republican Sponsorship
Government Operations

SB586

To Create The "protect Our Constitution Act"; And Amending A Portion Of The Arkansas Constitution As Authorized By Arkansas Constitution, Article 5, § 1.

Failed

Last Action (May 5, 2025): Died on Senate Calendar at Sine Die adjournment.

Sponsors

AI-Generated Summary

Senate Bill 586, titled the 'Protect Our Constitution Act,' proposes an amendment to the Arkansas Constitution regarding the threshold required for the passage of constitutional amendments referred to the voters. The bill mandates that any constitutional amendment must be approved by at least two-thirds of the votes cast upon the measure to become law, rather than the current simple majority requirement. This change applies specifically to constitutional amendments submitted to the people. The bill also includes an emergency clause, which would make the provision effective immediately upon the Governor's approval or an override of a veto, ensuring the new threshold is in place for the 2026 general election. The stated purpose is to ensure that constitutional changes reflect a broader consensus of the electorate.

Potential Impact Analysis

Who Might Benefit?

The primary beneficiaries of this bill are individuals and political groups who favor the status quo and wish to make it significantly more difficult to alter the Arkansas Constitution. Legislative bodies or political entities that prefer higher thresholds for constitutional changes may also see this as a benefit for maintaining institutional stability and preventing frequent or narrowly-passed constitutional modifications.

Who Might Suffer?

The groups most negatively impacted by this bill are citizen-led initiative groups, advocacy organizations, and grassroots movements that frequently use the ballot initiative process to propose constitutional changes. By requiring a two-thirds supermajority instead of a simple majority, the threshold for passing such initiatives becomes substantially higher, making it much harder for these groups to successfully enact their proposed constitutional amendments.

Vote Records

Third Reading

April 2, 2025
Yea: 13 Nay: 13 NV: 7 Absent: 2 Failed
View individual votes (35)
Legislator Party Chamber Vote
Jane English Republican Senate Nay
Jonathan Dismang Republican Senate Nay
Greg Leding Democrat Senate Nay
Missy Irvin Republican Senate NV
Bryan King Republican Senate Nay
Kim Hammer Republican Senate Absent
Stephanie Flowers Democrat Senate Absent
Frederick Love Democrat Senate Nay
Terry Rice Republican Senate NV
Reginald Murdock Democrat Senate Nay
Gary Stubblefield Republican Senate NV
Jim Dotson Republican Senate Yea
John Payton Republican Senate Yea
Alan Clark Republican Senate NV
Ronald Caldwell Republican Senate Nay
Bart Hester Republican Senate Yea
Jimmy Hickey Republican Senate Nay
Dan Sullivan Republican Senate Yea
David Wallace Republican Senate Yea
Blake Johnson Republican Senate Yea
Justin Boyd Republican Senate Yea
Clarke Tucker Democrat Senate Nay
Scott Flippo Republican Senate Nay
Clint Penzo Republican Senate NV
Mark Johnson Republican Senate Yea
Ricky Hill Republican Senate Nay
Jamie Scott Democrat Senate Nay
Breanne Davis Republican Senate Nay
Ben Gilmore Republican Senate Yea
Joshua Bryant Republican Senate NV
Matt McKee Republican Senate Yea
Jim Petty Republican Senate Yea
Steve Crowell Republican Senate NV
Tyler Dees Republican Senate Yea
Matt Stone Republican Senate Yea
Read Full Bill on arkleg.state.ar.us