everything you want to know (and don't) about arkansas politics

Republican Sponsorship
Government Operations

SB613

To Create An Election Procedure To Determine Fluoridation Of A Public Water System.

Failed

Last Action (May 5, 2025): Died in House at Sine Die adjournment.

Sponsors

AI-Generated Summary

Senate Bill 613 establishes a formal legal process for Arkansas residents served by a public water system to petition for an election regarding the fluoridation of their water supply. The bill mandates that a petition must be signed by at least 38% of the registered voters served by the specific public water system in question. It outlines strict requirements for the petition process, including the role of 'canvassers' and 'paid canvassers,' signature verification protocols by county clerks, and the use of accurate boundary maps. The legislation imposes criminal penalties for fraudulent actions, such as forgery or paying for signatures, and requires sponsors to maintain detailed records for paid canvassers. It provides clear guidelines for the petition format and the duties of election officials in managing these requests. Ultimately, the bill empowers local registered voters to influence public health policies related to water treatment through a direct democratic process.

Potential Impact Analysis

Who Might Benefit?

The primary beneficiaries include local citizens and groups who oppose the fluoridation of public water and seek a democratic mechanism to challenge or remove this practice in their communities. Additionally, proponents of increased local control and those who advocate for greater transparency and public participation in municipal utility decisions benefit from the establishment of this formalized procedure.

Who Might Suffer?

Public health agencies, medical professionals, and organizations that advocate for the public health benefits of water fluoridation may be negatively impacted if this bill results in the cessation of fluoridation programs. Additionally, operators of public water systems and local government administrative bodies may face increased financial and operational burdens due to the administrative requirements of verifying complex petitions and potentially organizing and conducting special elections.

Vote Records

Third Reading

April 8, 2025
Yea: 27 Nay: 7 NV: 1 Absent: 0 Passed
View individual votes (35)
Legislator Party Chamber Vote
Jane English Republican Senate Yea
Jonathan Dismang Republican Senate Yea
Greg Leding Democrat Senate Nay
Missy Irvin Republican Senate Yea
Bryan King Republican Senate Yea
Kim Hammer Republican Senate Yea
Stephanie Flowers Democrat Senate Nay
Frederick Love Democrat Senate Nay
Terry Rice Republican Senate Yea
Reginald Murdock Democrat Senate Nay
Gary Stubblefield Republican Senate Yea
Jim Dotson Republican Senate Yea
John Payton Republican Senate Yea
Alan Clark Republican Senate NV
Ronald Caldwell Republican Senate Yea
Bart Hester Republican Senate Yea
Jimmy Hickey Republican Senate Yea
Dan Sullivan Republican Senate Yea
David Wallace Republican Senate Yea
Blake Johnson Republican Senate Yea
Justin Boyd Republican Senate Yea
Clarke Tucker Democrat Senate Nay
Scott Flippo Republican Senate Yea
Clint Penzo Republican Senate Yea
Mark Johnson Republican Senate Nay
Ricky Hill Republican Senate Yea
Jamie Scott Democrat Senate Nay
Breanne Davis Republican Senate Yea
Ben Gilmore Republican Senate Yea
Joshua Bryant Republican Senate Yea
Matt McKee Republican Senate Yea
Jim Petty Republican Senate Yea
Steve Crowell Republican Senate Yea
Tyler Dees Republican Senate Yea
Matt Stone Republican Senate Yea
Read Full Bill on arkleg.state.ar.us