everything you want to know (and don't) about arkansas politics

Republican Sponsorship
Business & Economy

SB639

To Create The Arkansas Wind Energy Development Act.

Failed

Last Action (May 5, 2025): Died in House Committee at Sine Die adjournment.

Sponsors

AI-Generated Summary

Senate Bill 639, titled the 'Arkansas Wind Energy Development Act,' establishes a comprehensive framework for the permitting, construction, and operation of utility-scale wind energy facilities in Arkansas. It mandates that developers obtain permits from both the Arkansas Public Service Commission and applicable local government entities, provided the latter have established standards. The bill requires developers to notify various stakeholders, including nearby landowners, residents within a four-mile radius, and relevant state and county officials, via certified mail and public notice. It emphasizes the importance of protecting public health, safety, and the environment by requiring, among other things, that facilities provide financial assurance for decommissioning at the end of their useful life. The legislation defines key terms, such as 'abandonment' and 'wind energy facility,' and aims to balance the needs of energy developers with those of local communities and landowners. It also ensures that local governments retain the authority to enact local regulations on wind energy projects, provided these regulations meet or exceed the state's minimum standards.

Potential Impact Analysis

Who Might Benefit?

The primary beneficiaries include local governments, which gain the authority to regulate wind energy projects within their jurisdictions; neighboring landowners and residents within a four-mile radius, who receive formal notification and transparency regarding project developments; and the general public, who are intended to be protected by state-mandated standards regarding safety, decommissioning, and environmental impact. Additionally, landowners who lease their property for wind energy development benefit from standardized protection and clear regulatory processes.

Who Might Suffer?

The primary entities negatively impacted are wind energy developers, who will face increased regulatory burdens, higher compliance costs, and potential delays due to the dual-permitting process and rigorous notification requirements. Existing oil and gas operators and mineral lessees may also face administrative hurdles or potential conflicts regarding surface rights if their operations overlap with proposed wind energy facility sites, as they are specifically identified as parties requiring mandatory notice.

Vote Records

Third Reading

April 10, 2025
Yea: 33 Nay: 1 NV: 1 Absent: 0 Passed
View individual votes (35)
Legislator Party Chamber Vote
Jane English Republican Senate Yea
Jonathan Dismang Republican Senate Yea
Greg Leding Democrat Senate Yea
Missy Irvin Republican Senate Yea
Bryan King Republican Senate Yea
Kim Hammer Republican Senate Yea
Stephanie Flowers Democrat Senate NV
Frederick Love Democrat Senate Yea
Terry Rice Republican Senate Yea
Reginald Murdock Democrat Senate Nay
Gary Stubblefield Republican Senate Yea
Jim Dotson Republican Senate Yea
John Payton Republican Senate Yea
Alan Clark Republican Senate Yea
Ronald Caldwell Republican Senate Yea
Bart Hester Republican Senate Yea
Jimmy Hickey Republican Senate Yea
Dan Sullivan Republican Senate Yea
David Wallace Republican Senate Yea
Blake Johnson Republican Senate Yea
Justin Boyd Republican Senate Yea
Clarke Tucker Democrat Senate Yea
Scott Flippo Republican Senate Yea
Clint Penzo Republican Senate Yea
Mark Johnson Republican Senate Yea
Ricky Hill Republican Senate Yea
Jamie Scott Democrat Senate Yea
Breanne Davis Republican Senate Yea
Ben Gilmore Republican Senate Yea
Joshua Bryant Republican Senate Yea
Matt McKee Republican Senate Yea
Jim Petty Republican Senate Yea
Steve Crowell Republican Senate Yea
Tyler Dees Republican Senate Yea
Matt Stone Republican Senate Yea
Read Full Bill on arkleg.state.ar.us