SB15
An Act For The Department Of Parks, Heritage, And Tourism - State Parks And Tourism Divisions Appropriation For The 2026-2027 Fiscal Year.
Last Action (April 1, 2026): Read first time, rules suspended, read second time, referred to JOINT BUDGET COMMITTEE
Sponsors
AI-Generated Summary
Senate Bill 15 is an appropriations bill for the Arkansas Department of Parks, Heritage, and Tourism for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2027. It authorizes the maximum number of regular and extra-help personnel for the State Parks and Tourism divisions. The bill allocates funding from various sources, including the Parks and Tourism Fund, the Tourism Development Trust Fund, the Keep Arkansas Beautiful Fund, and federal funds. It provides appropriations for personal services, operating expenses, advertising, grants for outdoor recreation, and capital improvement projects. Essentially, this is a budgetary measure to ensure the continued administrative and operational functionality of Arkansas state parks and tourism-related programs. The legislation defines the specific salary grades for various staff roles ranging from directors to maintenance technicians and park rangers. Total appropriations are distributed across multiple departments and programs to support tourism promotion, conservation efforts, and infrastructure maintenance.
Potential Impact Analysis
Who Might Benefit?
The primary beneficiaries are the employees of the Arkansas Department of Parks, Heritage, and Tourism who rely on these funds for their salaries and benefits. Additionally, the state's tourism industry and visitors to Arkansas state parks benefit from the maintenance, operations, and advertising efforts supported by these appropriations. Local communities and organizations that receive grants for outdoor recreation and conservation initiatives are also direct beneficiaries of the funding provided.
Who Might Suffer?
There are no specific groups or entities directly and negatively impacted by this legislation, as it is a standard appropriations bill intended to fund existing government functions. However, if the funding levels were viewed as insufficient or prioritized differently, it could be argued that specific park facilities, potential grant recipients, or departmental projects might face resource constraints during the fiscal year.
Get Notified
Receive an email when this bill's status changes.