HR1013
To Authorize The Introduction Of A Nonappropriation Bill To Amend The Requirements For A Digital Asset Mining Business And Amend The Authority Of A Local Government With Respect To A Digital Asset Mining Business.
Last Action (April 8, 2026): Read the first time, rules suspended, read the second time and referred to the Committee on HOUSE RULES
Sponsors
AI-Generated Summary
This bill proposes amendments to the 'Arkansas Data Centers Act of 2023,' specifically targeting the regulation of digital asset mining businesses. It renames the act the 'Digital Asset Mining Act' and modifies requirements for mining operations, including stricter mandates for noise reduction and operational placement. The bill establishes that digital asset miners must comply with local ordinances, state/federal laws, and utility regulations, while explicitly requiring them to pay all applicable taxes and fees. It provides a legal framework for local residents to pursue civil action against digital asset mining businesses for noise disturbances. Additionally, the legislation clarifies the authority of local governments to regulate these businesses, while also setting limits on their ability to discriminate against or impose unique zoning restrictions on such operations. The bill also authorizes the Arkansas Public Service Commission to establish rules concerning rates for these businesses.
Potential Impact Analysis
Who Might Benefit?
The primary beneficiaries include local residents living near digital asset mining facilities, who gain stronger legal standing to challenge noise disturbances and seek damages. The bill also provides clearer regulatory expectations for digital asset mining businesses by defining compliance standards, noise mitigation techniques, and zoning protections, which could reduce legal ambiguity for these companies. Additionally, the state and local governments benefit from explicit requirements that these businesses must pay all applicable taxes and fees.
Who Might Suffer?
Digital asset mining companies may be negatively impacted due to more stringent operational requirements, such as mandated noise-reduction techniques and specific setback distances from residential or commercial structures. These requirements could increase overhead costs and limit site selection flexibility. Furthermore, because the bill provides a clear pathway for neighboring property owners to sue for noise violations and collect attorney's fees, mining operators face an increased risk of litigation and operational liability.
Get Notified
Receive an email when this bill's status changes.